Built in Finland for EU customers, languages, and EU data privacy laws

For Enterprises

Turn stakeholder research into a standing capability.

Run employee, culture, and change research on a recurring cadence, natively across every language and market you operate in, without rebuilding the program from scratch each time.

culture-pulse fy26WAVE 4 OF 4
82%
Q1
85%
Q2
88%
Q3
91%
Q4

Participation rate, same protocol, four waves running

ENDEFRFIPLES+64 more
This wave's respondents, across 12 markets
Enterprise-grade encryption, end to end
EU data sovereignty, built in Finland
100% auditable transcripts
42 languages, natively voice-led

Run the programs your org relies on

Built for research that repeats, not a one-off project.

The same protocol, run again every wave, across every market you operate in.

HR & culture

Employee Engagement & Culture Studies

Interview every employee, not a sample, and get organization-wide patterns broken down by team and geography, wave over wave.

Multilingual & EU

Pan-European Stakeholder Research

Run one study natively across 42 languages instead of stitching together local vendors and paying for translation.

Change readiness

Change & Transformation Diagnostics

Track sentiment across a transformation program in waves, so resistance shows up in the data before it shows up in the rollout.

Exit & lifecycle

Exit & Lifecycle Interviews

Understand why people really leave, or what nearly made them, a standing program, not an annual scramble to staff it.

AI Transformation

AI Rollout Readiness

Before you automate a process, know how it actually runs today. Interview everyone who touches it and get back the steps, the decisions, the exceptions, and the workarounds that never made it into the SOP, the details that break an agent on day one, surfaced before anyone writes a line of it.

See how it works  →

AI Transformation

Know how a process actually runs, before anyone automates it.

There's a date on the wall for the first agents. Valogent interviews everyone who touches the process today, not the one person free for a workshop, and hands the build team a map instead of a slide deck.

+95
100 people across sales, ops, and support, interviewed this wave, not sampled

What we hear from AI transformation leaders

“

There's a date on the wall for the first agents, and I need to know how 200 reps actually run their deals before we build any of it. Not the playbook version. The real one. There's one of me, and the calendars alone would take a quarter.

Revenue Operations DirectorEnterprise Software
“

We sent a survey before automating campaign production. A fifth replied, in tick boxes. I can tell you how many people touch a campaign. I still can’t tell you what any of them do when the brief changes halfway through.

Marketing Operations LeadConsumer Brands
100Employees interviewed
6 daysTo a full process library
ZeroWorkshops booked to get there

Every account, reconciled into one map

01

Process steps

What actually happens, in order, including the step that never made it into the SOP.

Amara, Sales Rep
02

Decisions

Who decides, on what basis, and who they go and ask when they aren’t sure.

Dev, Support Lead
03

Exceptions

The cases that don’t follow the rule, the ones that break an agent on its first day.

Priya, Finance Analyst
04

Pains

Where the work is slow, done twice, or quietly hated by everyone doing it.

Owen, Ops Coordinator
05

Ideas

What the people doing the job would fix first, if anyone had asked them.

Lina, Team Lead

Build from an SOP

  • A process doc somebody wrote two years ago
  • Discovery quality depends on which analyst you can spare
  • Debrief after every workshop and hope the notes hold up
  • Find the edge cases after the agent ships

Build from this wave's interviews

  • Built from what the people doing the job said last week
  • The same interview protocol, run consistently, every time
  • Every conversation returns structured: steps, decisions, exceptions
  • Know the exceptions before anyone writes a line of it

The advantage

Annual surveys give you a number once a year. Programs need more.

A one-off project gets re-scoped, re-vendored, and re-explained every single time it runs.

One-off projects

  • A new vendor and a new methodology every time
  • Coverage stops at whichever region had budget
  • Findings arrive after the moment to act has passed
  • Every language is a separate line item

Valogent

  • One protocol, run again every quarter
  • Every market, every language, from day one
  • Insight inside the same week the wave closes
  • 42 languages included in the same workflow

Everything you need

Built to run again, not just once.

The infrastructure a standing research program needs, not a project kit.

Standing interview protocols

Reuse and refine the same study wave over wave, instead of rebuilding it each time.

Every employee, not a sample

Full-population coverage at survey scale, every wave, not just the years budget allows it.

42 languages, natively voice-led

One workflow for every market you operate in, with no translation pass in between.

Trend tracking across waves

See how sentiment moves quarter to quarter, on the same axes, automatically.

EU data sovereignty

GDPR-aligned by default, with full transcript auditability for works councils and legal.

Role-based access

HRBPs and leadership see only what they should, scoped by team, region, or role.

FAQ

Before you build the program

Can this replace our annual engagement survey?

It pairs with it, or replaces the parts that only ever gave you a number. Most teams keep a lightweight pulse survey and add Valogent for the "why" behind it, at the same cadence.

How does it handle multiple languages in one global study?

One protocol runs natively in 42 languages at once, each employee is interviewed in their own language, with no separate vendor or translation pass required.

Who can access the results inside our organization?

Access is role-based and scoped by team or region, so an HRBP sees their group’s findings and leadership sees the org-wide view, not the other way around.

Can we run the same study again next quarter and compare?

Yes. That’s the standing-program model. The same protocol runs wave over wave, with trend tracking built in from the second wave onward.

Is this compliant with EU works council and employee data requirements?

Valogent is built in Finland for EU customers, with GDPR-aligned handling and full transcript auditability by default, documentation your works council or legal team can review directly.

How is this different from running interviews ourselves?

In-house teams hit the same ceiling any interviewer does: one conversation at a time. Valogent runs the whole population in parallel, in-language, without a temporary hiring push every wave.

Build a standing program, not another one-off project.

See what the first wave looks like across your actual markets and languages.